Home/ Case Studies/ Savage X Fenty

Savage X Fenty

How Rihanna built a $1 billion lingerie brand in four years by doing what Victoria's Secret spent decades refusing to do.

Updated March 20, 2026

In April 2020, Victoria’s Secret reported a 63% drop in sales. That same month, Savage X Fenty posted 218% growth. The pandemic didn’t explain the gap. The gap had been building for years.

Savage X Fenty launched on May 11, 2018 at sizes XS through 4X, bra band sizes 30A through 46DDD, and 90 shades of nude. The debut collection sold out within a month. Rihanna didn’t run a single paid advertisement. She posted on Instagram.

By January 2022 the brand was valued at $1 billion, had raised approximately $300 million in total funding, and was exploring a $3 billion IPO that never materialized. Victoria’s Secret, which once controlled 32% of the U.S. lingerie market, had watched that share erode to 22% by 2024. Rihanna, the same founder who had already reshaped the beauty industry, had done it again in an entirely different category using exactly the same insight: large incumbents were ignoring the majority of their potential customers, and that gap was worth a fortune to whoever got there first.


At a glance:

FoundedMay 11, 2018
FounderRobyn Rihanna Fenty
PartnerTechStyle Fashion Group
Ownership~30% Rihanna
Annual revenue (est.)~$150 million
Valuation (Jan 2022)$1 billion (Series C)
Total raised~$300 million
Physical retail~14 owned stores + 16 Nordstrom doors
VIP Membership$59.95/month credit

The Story

The gap Victoria’s Secret refused to close

Victoria’s Secret had held a near-monopoly on the American lingerie market for decades, generating over $7 billion in annual revenue at its peak and owning roughly 32% of U.S. women’s underwear sales. Its entire identity was built around a single, narrow version of beauty: thin, tall, mostly white bodies on a runway in angel wings, broadcast on network television to millions of viewers who were implicitly told that this was the goal.

In 2018, L Brands CMO Ed Razek told Vogue that the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show shouldn’t cast plus-size or transgender models because “the show is a fantasy.” He was forced out within a year. The brand’s stock price had already dropped roughly 50% from its 2015 peak. Its leadership couldn’t see that the fantasy had started to look like a refusal to acknowledge who its customers actually were.

Rihanna had been watching. She had already built Fenty Beauty on the same premise: that the biggest players in an industry were leaving enormous amounts of money on the table by treating the majority of women as edge cases. With Fenty Beauty, the gap was foundation shades. With lingerie, the gap was everything from bra sizing to body representation to the basic assumption that women who weren’t sample-sized weren’t worth selling to.

Launch and the first four years

Savage X Fenty launched as a joint venture with TechStyle Fashion Group, the e-commerce company behind Fabletics and JustFab. TechStyle brought the operational infrastructure: fulfillment logistics, subscription commerce systems, and the membership model it had spent years refining. Rihanna brought creative direction, a global audience, and the cultural authority to make the brand feel like a statement rather than a product line.

The debut collection offered sizes XS through 4X, 30A through 46DDD bra sizing, and 90 shades of nude. That last figure is worth pausing on. Victoria’s Secret, at the time, offered nude in approximately two shades. Savage X Fenty launched with ninety. The collection sold out within a month without a dollar of paid advertising.

Four months after the online launch, Rihanna closed New York Fashion Week in September 2018 with a runway show at the Brooklyn Navy Yard that featured models of every size, shape, and background, including Slick Woods walking the runway at nearly nine months pregnant. The show didn’t position itself as an alternative to Victoria’s Secret. It made the Victoria’s Secret show look like a period piece.

By August 2019, the brand had raised a $50 million Series A led by Jay-Z’s Marcy Venture Partners and Avenir Growth Capital. In February 2021, a $115 million Series B led by L Catterton, the venture capital firm backed by LVMH, pushed the total raised past $165 million and valued the company at $1 billion. A $125 million Series C in January 2022, led by Neuberger Berman with participation from Advent International and Multiply Group from Abu Dhabi, brought total funding to approximately $300 million and confirmed the $1 billion valuation.

Leadership shifts and where it stands

Rihanna served as CEO through the brand’s early years, then stepped into an Executive Chair role in June 2023 when Hillary Super, former CEO of Anthropologie Group, came in to run operations. Fourteen months later, Super departed to become CEO of Victoria’s Secret, reportedly for a package worth approximately $18 million. The irony was hard to miss: the company that Savage X Fenty had spent years displacing had just hired away its leadership.

The $3 billion IPO that Bloomberg reported in March 2022 never materialized. By 2024, reports of stagnant revenue and internal layoffs had surfaced. The brand remains private, with no permanent CEO publicly confirmed as of early 2026.


The Strategy

Treating size inclusivity as market research

Most mainstream lingerie brands in 2018 topped out around XL or XXL and treated extended sizing as a small, separate collection with fewer styles and less marketing support. Savage X Fenty launched with sizes XS through 4X and 90 nude shades and made every size available in every style at the same price point, with no upcharge for larger sizes.

This is the same structural move Rihanna made at Fenty Beauty with 40 foundation shades, and the same move Skims made with XXS through 5X shapewear and nine nude shades. The pattern keeps working because incumbents keep making the same mistake: they leave entire demographics underserved because expanding the range increases manufacturing complexity and doesn’t fit the brand image they’ve spent decades building. The challenger brand serves those customers from day one, captures their loyalty early, and takes market share before the incumbent has finished debating whether to add two more sizes.

Customers who came to Savage X Fenty spent an average of $176.94 in their first 12 months. Victoria’s Secret customers averaged $103.57 over the same period. That 71% gap reflects stronger engagement, more repeat purchases, or both. Victoria’s Secret didn’t launch an extended-size range until years after Savage X Fenty proved the demand was real.

The VIP Membership as a revenue engine

TechStyle’s core business model is subscription commerce, and Savage X Fenty adopted it from launch through its VIP membership program. Members pay $59.95 per month and receive a credit of equal value to spend on any product. Members who don’t want to purchase in a given month must actively log in and skip before the 5th of the month, or the charge converts to store credit.

The model generates predictable recurring revenue, which makes the brand’s financial profile look more like a software subscription than a typical DTC retailer, something that matters considerably when pitching institutional investors. At its peak, the VIP program had grown 150% year over year and represented a significant share of total company revenue.

The risks of that model surfaced publicly in November 2022, when California prosecutors reached a $1.2 million settlement with the brand over the VIP membership’s enrollment and cancellation practices. The FTC, acting under the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, found that customers were being enrolled without clear disclosure and were having difficulty canceling. The settlement required a redesigned website, improved cancellation processes, and refunds to affected members. TechStyle’s other brands had faced similar complaints for years. The settlement suggests the execution failed, not the concept.

Building a physical retail presence

Alongside its Series C in January 2022, Savage X Fenty announced it would open physical stores for the first time. By 2024, the brand operated approximately 14 standalone locations in the United States and had expanded into 16 Nordstrom doors, its first major retail distribution partnership, beginning in August 2024.

Lingerie is a category where physical retail has an enduring advantage: fit is difficult to assess from a product page, and bra sizing in particular requires trying on before buying. The Nordstrom partnership gives Savage X Fenty distribution in markets where it has no standalone store while placing the brand alongside other premium labels in an environment that signals quality.

The move toward physical retail also reflects the ceiling that pure DTC brands typically hit when digital customer acquisition costs climb and the addressable online audience starts to saturate. Scaling a product business beyond a certain point almost always requires going offline.


Marketing

The Savage X Fenty Show

The single most distinctive thing about how Savage X Fenty marketed itself was building its fashion show into a standalone entertainment property, produced by Amazon and distributed on Prime Video.

The Savage X Fenty Show debuted in September 2019 from the Barclays Center in Brooklyn. Volume 2 followed in October 2020, Volume 3 in September 2021, and Volume 4 in November 2022. All four were choreographed by Parris Goebel, a New Zealand-born choreographer who had previously worked with Jennifer Lopez and Justin Bieber. Volume 3 won the 2022 Primetime Emmy Award for outstanding choreography for a variety or reality program.

That last fact deserves attention. A lingerie brand’s marketing won a television Emmy. Each show aired in over 240 countries and streamed to Amazon’s global Prime subscriber base. Victoria’s Secret was paying for network airtime and watching ratings fall every year. Rihanna had Amazon distribute her marketing for free to millions of subscribers who watched it voluntarily.

Each show also functioned as a product launch. Every piece worn in the show was shoppable on Amazon Fashion and savagex.com immediately after the episode aired. The performers across the four volumes, including Halsey, Erykah Badu, Nas, Anitta, and Daddy Yankee, generated their own press cycles. The casting announcements generated additional news cycles before the show even premiered. The earned media output was substantial and none of it required a media buy.

Volume 4 generated controversy when a brief cameo by Johnny Depp, filmed in the aftermath of his defamation trial against Amber Heard, prompted the hashtag #DitchDepp to trend and drew public criticism from several artists and fans. The brand did not publicly comment.

Rihanna’s audience as the distribution channel

Like Fenty Beauty, Savage X Fenty launched without traditional advertising because Rihanna’s own presence was the media channel. Her Instagram, which reached over 150 million followers, gave the brand access to an audience that no paid media budget could replicate at the same cost or with the same credibility. She posted wearing her own designs, positioned herself as a customer rather than a spokesperson, and drove the debut sellout without running a single ad.

The brand extended this approach through influencer marketing at genuine scale, seeding products to creators across a wide range of body sizes and skin tones, not only those with the largest followings. When an influencer who has never received lingerie from a major brand posts about getting a Savage X Fenty package that actually fits her, that content converts at rates that paid campaigns typically don’t reach. The Fenty Effect didn’t stop at beauty.


The Numbers

YearMilestone
May 2018Launch; debut collection sells out within one month, zero paid advertising
August 2019$50M Series A; ~$150M in sales
February 2021$115M Series B at $1B valuation
January 2022$125M Series C; first retail store opens in Las Vegas
March 2022$3B IPO explored; never filed
November 2022$1.2M FTC/ROSCA settlement over VIP membership
June 2023Rihanna steps to Executive Chair; Hillary Super becomes CEO
August 2024Super departs for Victoria’s Secret; Nordstrom partnership launches

Total funding raised: Approximately $300 million across four rounds.

Key investors: L Catterton (LVMH-backed), Neuberger Berman, Advent International, Avenir Growth Capital, Marcy Venture Partners (Jay-Z), Multiply Group (Abu Dhabi, $25 million).

Valuation: $1 billion as of January 2022 Series C. A $3 billion IPO was explored but never filed.

Revenue: Estimated at approximately $150 million annually. The brand has not publicly disclosed revenue.

Margins and profitability: Not publicly disclosed. The combination of product manufacturing, VIP subscription logistics, the Amazon show productions, and physical retail build-out creates a cost structure considerably more complex than the revenue figure alone suggests.


Rihanna’s Full Portfolio

Savage X Fenty sits alongside Fenty Beauty in a portfolio that makes Rihanna the wealthiest female musician in the world, with a net worth estimated at approximately $1.4 billion. Fenty Beauty generates roughly $450 million annually and she owns 50%. Savage X Fenty generates roughly $150 million annually and she owns approximately 30%.

The two businesses illustrate two different paths to building a celebrity brand at scale. Fenty Beauty was built as a 50/50 partnership with LVMH’s Kendo Brands, which handled manufacturing, distribution, and supply chain, while Rihanna kept creative control and equal equity. Savage X Fenty was built with a consumer technology company and venture investors, which provided more capital earlier but diluted her stake with each subsequent round.

Both brands exploited the same gap: an industry that had decided a large portion of its potential customers weren’t worth serving. Both worked. The difference in scale partly reflects the difference in ownership structure and partly reflects the different economics of beauty versus apparel.


Controversies

The subscription trap

The Xtra VIP membership program enrolled customers into a $49.95-per-month recurring charge through an interface that consumer watchdogs argued was designed to obscure what customers were signing up for. Customers reported clicking what appeared to be a discounted product price and discovering the subscription weeks or months later when the charge appeared on their credit card statements. Truth in Advertising filed FTC complaints in early 2020. The Better Business Bureau catalogued hundreds of similar complaints. The California civil action, brought by district attorneys’ offices across the state and the Santa Monica City Attorney, settled in November 2022 for $1.2 million: $1 million in civil penalties, $150,000 in consumer restitution, and $50,000 in investigative costs. The settlement required the company to add a mandatory checkbox for subscription consent, display clearer automatic renewal notices, improve its store credit system, and make cancellation straightforward.

What makes this controversy worth examining is what was known before it happened. TechStyle Fashion Group, Savage X Fenty’s operational partner, had paid $1.8 million in 2014 to settle nearly identical allegations about JustFab’s enrollment practices. The UK Advertising Standards Authority banned JustFab ads in August 2017. Savage X Fenty partnered with TechStyle and adopted the same subscription model regardless. The settlement was described as a consumer protection failure, but it was more accurately a predictable outcome.

Islamic hadith in Vol. 2

The Savage X Fenty Show Vol. 2, which premiered on Amazon Prime Video in October 2020, featured a scene in which models danced in lingerie to a song that included a recording of a hadith, a text recording the sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad that holds second-highest authority in Islamic tradition after the Quran. Muslim viewers and commentators called the use of sacred scripture as a soundtrack for a lingerie show deeply disrespectful. Rihanna apologized on Instagram, describing the incident as “an honest, yet careless mistake.” The producer, London artist Coucou Chloe, also issued an apology and removed the track from streaming platforms.

The Johnny Depp casting

Volume 4 of the Savage X Fenty Show, which aired in November 2022, included a 40-second cameo from Johnny Depp, who had won a defamation suit against Amber Heard earlier that year. A portion of the brand’s audience viewed the casting as a statement of support for Depp during a period when Heard’s abuse allegations remained part of the public conversation. The hashtag #DitchDepp trended on social media. British singer Olly Alexander announced publicly that he would no longer wear the brand. Music producer Drew Dixon described the casting as “really disappointing.” The brand did not comment publicly.


What You Can Learn

The same gap-finding skill applies across categories. Rihanna didn’t develop two separate insights for beauty and lingerie. She noticed one pattern, that large incumbents were ignoring the majority of their potential customers because those customers didn’t fit the existing brand identity, and applied it twice. Fenty Beauty proved it with foundation shades. Savage X Fenty proved it with bra sizes and price points. If you’ve found one industry doing this, look at the industries adjacent to it. They are almost certainly doing the same thing.

Your operational partner’s reputation travels with you. TechStyle Fashion Group had settled complaints about JustFab’s subscription enrollment practices in 2014, eight years before the Savage X Fenty settlement. The infrastructure TechStyle provided was real, the membership model generated meaningful recurring revenue, and the venture capital community rewarded the brand for its subscription-like financial profile. It also brought a playbook with a documented history of consumer harm. When you choose a partner for their infrastructure, you inherit their methods.

A fashion show can replace a marketing budget, but only if it’s genuinely better than advertising. Victoria’s Secret’s fashion show was advertising dressed up as entertainment, and eventually audiences treated it that way. The Savage X Fenty Show on Amazon Prime was entertainment that also happened to sell lingerie, and it won an Emmy. The difference is not production value. It’s whether the thing exists to serve the brand or to serve the audience. The latter generates earned media at a scale no paid budget can match.

Dark patterns destroy the trust you earned with your product. Savage X Fenty built genuine loyalty through size-inclusive design, accessible pricing, and a brand identity that felt like it was made for real women. The VIP enrollment controversy didn’t just cost $1.2 million. It became a defining story about the brand, the kind that appears in the third paragraph of any critical article about the company. A business model that depends on customers not understanding what they signed up for is not a business model. It is a liability.

Even a $1 billion brand loses its CEO to the competition. Victoria’s Secret hired Hillary Super away from Savage X Fenty with an $18 million package in August 2024. The incumbent that Savage X Fenty was built to displace went looking for the talent that had been preparing the challenger for a public offering. There is no clean lesson here except that hiring is never finished and the people who build your brand are always valuable to the competition.


Frequently Asked Questions

How much is Savage X Fenty worth?

The most recent confirmed valuation is $1 billion, set in January 2022 following a $125 million Series C round led by Neuberger Berman. In March 2022, Bloomberg reported that the brand was exploring a New York Stock Exchange listing at up to $3 billion, but no filing was ever made. No updated valuation has been publicly confirmed since, and the IPO process appears to have been shelved.

How much does Rihanna own of Savage X Fenty?

Rihanna owns approximately 30% of Savage X Fenty, according to Forbes estimates. At the $1 billion valuation, that stake is worth roughly $300 million. The remainder is held by TechStyle Fashion Group and the institutional investors from the brand’s four funding rounds. Each round diluted her percentage ownership from whatever she held at founding.

Why is Rihanna’s ownership stake lower at Savage X Fenty than at Fenty Beauty?

At Fenty Beauty, Rihanna negotiated a 50/50 partnership with LVMH’s Kendo Brands from the start, taking no outside venture funding. At Savage X Fenty, the brand raised approximately $300 million across four funding rounds, and each round diluted Rihanna’s equity in exchange for capital. The structure reflects two entirely different approaches to building a celebrity brand: one through a direct conglomerate partnership, one through venture capital.

Did Savage X Fenty ever go public?

No. Bloomberg reported in March 2022 that the brand was exploring a New York Stock Exchange listing at a $3 billion valuation, but no S-1 was ever filed and the IPO process never advanced. By 2024, reports of stagnant sales and internal layoffs suggested the timing was not favorable, and the brand has remained private.

How does the VIP Membership work, and what was the FTC issue?

VIP members pay $59.95 per month and receive a credit of equal value to spend on any product. Members must actively skip the month by the 5th of each month to avoid being charged. In November 2022, Savage X Fenty reached a $1.2 million settlement with California prosecutors after the FTC found the brand had violated the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act by enrolling customers without clear disclosure and making cancellation difficult. The settlement required website redesigns, improved cancellation processes, and refunds to affected customers.

How does Savage X Fenty compare to Skims?

Both brands built their businesses on size inclusivity in a category that had historically ignored it, both were launched by celebrities with massive social media followings, and both launched within a year of each other. Skims (2019) has grown faster: revenue approaching $1 billion versus Savage X Fenty’s estimated $150 million, and a $5 billion valuation versus $1 billion. Kim Kardashian owns approximately 35% of Skims. Rihanna owns approximately 30% of Savage X Fenty. The key operational difference is that Skims has achieved profitability and raised nearly $900 million, while Savage X Fenty has raised approximately $300 million and has not confirmed profitability. Skims does not use a subscription model. Savage X Fenty depends significantly on VIP membership revenue.

How does Savage X Fenty compare to Victoria’s Secret?

Victoria’s Secret once held 32% of the U.S. lingerie market. That share dropped to 22% by 2024. Savage X Fenty launched specifically where Victoria’s Secret had refused to go: extended sizing, genuine shade diversity in nude products, and marketing that centered bodies the Victoria’s Secret runway would never have cast. In August 2024, Victoria’s Secret hired Savage X Fenty’s CEO Hillary Super for a reported $18 million compensation package, effectively signaling that the incumbent had decided to learn from the brand it spent years ignoring.

What happened at the Savage X Fenty Show?

The Savage X Fenty Show aired on Amazon Prime Video in four volumes between 2019 and 2022, all choreographed by Parris Goebel. Volume 1 premiered at the Barclays Center in September 2019. Volume 2 aired in October 2020. Volume 3 aired in September 2021 and won the 2022 Primetime Emmy Award for outstanding choreography. Volume 4 aired in November 2022 and drew controversy over a cameo by Johnny Depp. Each show featured musical performances, diverse casting, and shoppable collections available immediately after the premiere.

Who founded Savage X Fenty?

Robyn Rihanna Fenty founded Savage X Fenty in 2018 as a joint venture with TechStyle Fashion Group, the e-commerce company behind Fabletics and JustFab. Rihanna brought creative direction and her global audience. TechStyle brought subscription commerce infrastructure and fulfillment logistics.

When was Savage X Fenty founded?

Savage X Fenty launched on May 11, 2018. The debut collection sold out within a month without any paid advertising.

Who owns Savage X Fenty?

Rihanna owns approximately 30% of Savage X Fenty, with the remainder held by TechStyle Fashion Group and institutional investors from four funding rounds. Major investors include L Catterton (LVMH-backed), Neuberger Berman, Advent International, Avenir Growth Capital, Marcy Venture Partners (Jay-Z), and Multiply Group from Abu Dhabi.

What is Rihanna’s net worth?

Rihanna’s net worth is estimated at approximately $1.4 billion, making her the wealthiest female musician in the world. Her Fenty Beauty stake (50%) is the largest single contributor, followed by her approximately 30% stake in Savage X Fenty.

What happened to Savage X Fenty?

The brand explored a $3 billion IPO in March 2022 but never filed. By 2024, reports of stagnant revenue and internal layoffs surfaced, and CEO Hillary Super departed for Victoria’s Secret in August 2024. Savage X Fenty remains private with no permanent CEO publicly confirmed as of early 2026.


Sources